City field guide

Preparedness begins with place.

Browse editorial assessments of U.S. cities, their hazards, resources, and infrastructure context.

Idaho

Boise

Boise combines direct access to public land with a diversified regional economy, but summer heat, smoke, and the wildland–urban interface deserve serious planning.

Risk 3.5 / 5View profile →

Colorado

Fort Collins

Fort Collins offers outdoor access and strong civic infrastructure, balanced against wildfire, smoke, hail, winter storms, and flood history.

Risk 0.0 / 5View profile →

Alabama

Huntsville

Huntsville has strong technical institutions and nearby reservoirs, but tornadoes, severe thunderstorms, heat, and localized flooding are material hazards.

Risk 0.0 / 5View profile →

Tennessee

Knoxville

Knoxville benefits from abundant regional water and access to mountain terrain, while flooding, severe storms, heat, and constrained valleys require planning.

Risk 0.0 / 5View profile →

North Carolina

Raleigh

Raleigh has substantial medical, educational, and transportation capacity, while tropical systems, heat, ice, and rapid growth complicate preparedness.

Risk 0.0 / 5View profile →

Washington

Spokane

Spokane’s inland setting avoids coastal hazards, but wildfire smoke, nearby grass and forest fires, winter weather, and heat remain significant.

Risk 0.0 / 5View profile →